Download:
The Rites of Hajj 2026
- INTRODUCTION The Merits and Significance of Hajj
INTRODUCTION
The Merits and Significance of Hajj
Hajj (the pilgrimage to Mecca (Makkah al-Mukarramah)), in the terminology of the Sacred Law (Sharīʿah), consists of a series of specific rites regarded as one of the foundational pillars of Islam. As narrated from Imam al-Bāqir (peace be upon him):
"Islam is founded on five [pillars]: prayer (daily ṣalāt), zakāt, fasting (sawm), pilgrimage [to Makkah al-Mukarramah] (Hajj), and guardianship (wilāyah)."[1]
Whether obligatory (wājib) or recommended (mustaḥabb), Hajj carries immense merit and abundant reward. Numerous narrations from the Holy Prophet and his purified Household (peace be upon them) emphasize the merits of Hajj. Imam al-Ṣādiq (peace be upon him) states:
"The Hajj and ‘Umrah pilgrims are the guests of Allah. If they ask Him, He grants; if they call upon Him, He responds; if they intercede, He accepts their intercession; and if they remain silent, He bestows upon them Himself. For each dirham they spend [in the path of Hajj], Allah rewards them with one million dirhams."[2]
The Hajj is one of the most important religious obligations and a fundamental pillar of Islamic Shariʿah. It is a unique farīḍah (obligatory act), as if all significant aspects of the individual and social, earthly and heavenly, as well as historical and universal dimensions of the religion are to be reviewed within it. Spirituality is embedded within it, but it is without isolation, seclusion, or solitary retreat. It embodies congregation and unity, yet is free from conflict, slander, or malevolence. On the one hand, it offers the spiritual delight of supplication, invocation, and remembrance of Allah; on the other hand, it fosters human connection, intimacy, and social interaction. With one eye, the Hajj pilgrim witnesses his ancient bond with history—with Abraham, Ishmael, and Hagar, with the Holy Prophet during his triumphant entry into the Sacred Mosque (al-Masjid al-Ḥarām), and with the multitude of believers from the early era of Islam. With the other eye, he beholds the vast assembly of contemporary believers, each potentially extending a hand for collective solidarity and unity, holding fast to Allah’s cord.
Reflecting upon the phenomenon of Hajj leads the Hajj pilgrim to a firm conviction: many of the aspirations and ideals of religion for humanity cannot be realized without the faithful community’s synergy, empathy, and cooperation. Moreover, when such solidarity and collaboration emerge, the schemes and enmity of adversaries pose no significant obstacle along this path.
- CHAPTER ONE General Rulings
- CHAPTER TWO The Obligatory Hajj (the Ḥajjat ul-Islam)
- CHAPTER THREE The Proxy (Niyābah) in Hajj
- The Conditions for the Proxy (Nā’ib) in Hajj
The Conditions for the Proxy (Nā’ib) in Hajj
Ruling 96: The person appointed as a proxy (nā’ib) to perform Hajj must meet the following conditions:
Being Bāligh (having reached the age of religious (shar‘ī) maturity), as a matter of obligatory caution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al-wājib).
Being ‘Āqil (Sane).
Being Trustworthy and Reliable: There must be a reasonable assurance that the proxy will properly perform the Hajj rites.
Being a Twelver Shī‘a Muslim, as a matter of obligatory caution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al-wājib).
Being Knowledgeable about the Rites and Rulings of Hajj or learning them during the pilgrimage with the guidance of the caravan’s religious scholar or by referring to a manual of Hajj rites (manāsik al-Ḥajj). In any case, if, after performing Hajj, it is established that he has correctly performed the rites, his proxy Hajj is valid.
Not Being Financially Capable (Mustaṭī‘) of performing his own Hajj in that year; in other words, not having an obligatory Hajj upon himself in that year. However, if the proxy (nā’ib) does not know that Hajj is obligatory upon him, it is not remote to say his Hajj on behalf of another person is valid.
Being [physically] Capable of Performing Completely All the Rites of Hajj: If he has an excuse (‘udhr) preventing him from performing certain essential acts due to a valid excuse, his proxy (niyābah) is not valid. For example, if he is entirely unable to recite ṣalāt (prayer) al-ṭawāf correctly, his proxy (niyābah) is not valid. If he is capable of learning correct recitation (qirāʾah), it is obligatory for him to do so.
Ruling 97: Once it has been established that a proxy (nā’ib) has performed the Hajj, there is no obligation to ascertain the correctness (ṣiḥḥa) of his performance; rather, his performance is to be presumed valid (ḥaml ʿalā al-ṣiḥḥah).
- The Conditions for the Person Represented (Manūb ‘Anhu)
The Conditions for the Person Represented (Manūb ‘Anhu)
Ruling 98: The person on whose behalf the Hajj is performed (manūb ‘anhu) must meet the following conditions:
The person represented (manūb ‘anhu) must be a Muslim; performing Hajj on behalf of a non-Muslim (kāfir) is not valid.
The Proxy (Niyābah) for an obligatory (wājib) Hajj (Ḥajjat ul-Islam) is considered valid only if the person represented (manūb‘anhu) is deceased or unable to perform Hajj due to old age or illness, even in future years, without excessive hardship (mashaqqah). However, the proxy (niyābah) for a recommended (mustaḥabb) Hajj is permissible in all circumstances.
- The Rulings of the Proxy (Niyābah)
The Rulings of the Proxy (Niyābah)
Ruling 99: Sanity (ʿaql) and religious (shar‘ī) maturity (bulūgh) are not conditions for the person on whose behalf Hajj is performed (manūb ʿanhu).
Ruling 100: A proxy (Niyābah) by a man on behalf of a woman, or by a woman on behalf of a man, is valid.
Ruling 101: It is permissible for a ṣarūrah—one who has not yet performed Hajj—to act as a proxy (nāʾib) for another ṣarūrah or a non-ṣarūrah, whether the proxy or the person on whose behalf the Hajj is performed (manūb ʿanhu) is male or female.
Ruling 102: In a proxy Hajj, the intention (nīyyah) to act as a proxy and to specify the person on whose behalf the Hajj is being performed (manūb ʿanh), even if in a general sense, is a condition. However, it is not obligatory to articulate this intention verbally.
Ruling 103: It is not valid to hire a person as a proxy if he is obligated to change his intention (nīyyah) from the Hajj al-Tamattu‘ to the Hajj al-Ifrād due to insufficient time. However, if the proxy is hired when there is sufficient time, and if later circumstances happen to cause the time to be restricted, then it is obligatory for him either to enter into iḥrām with the intention of the Hajj al-Ifrād, or to change his intention to the Hajj al-Ifrād. In such a case, the proxy’s performance suffices for the Hajj al-Tamattu‘ of the person on whose behalf the Hajj is performed (manūb ‘anhu), and he is entitled to receive the agreed-upon wage (ujra).
Ruling 104: If a person is hired to perform Hajj for a specified wage (ujra) that is less than the actual expenses of Hajj, the hirer (mustaʾjir) is not obligated to cover the shortfall. Similarly, if part of the payment remains unused, the hirer has no right to reclaim the surplus.
Ruling 105: If the proxy’s performance of the Hajj does not suffice for the person on whose behalf the Hajj is performed (manūb ʿanh):
If the proxy is hired to perform the Hajj for the same Hajj season, it is obligatory for him to return the payment (ujra) to the hirer (mustaʾjir).
If the proxy is hired to perform the Hajj in a future year, he is obligated to repeat the Hajj in subsequent years to fulfil his obligation.
Ruling 106: It is not permissible for a person excused (maʿdhūr) from performing certain hajj rites to act as a proxy. An excused person (maʿdhūr) is someone unable to perform some optional hajj rites, such as: uttering the talbīyah (saying labbayk) correctly, walking on his foot during ṭawāf and saʿy, reciting ṣalāt al-ṭawāf correctly, stoning (ramy) the jamarāt al-‘aqabah( by his own hand, staying (wuqūf) in ‘Arafāt and al-Mash‘ar al-Ḥarām (muzdalifah) at their prescribed time, and staying overnight (baytūtah) [of the 11th and 12th of Dhul-Hijjah] in Minā. This inability results in the incomplete performance of certain hajj rites, so the proxy of an excused person (maʿdhūr) is not valid. However, if an excused person (maʿdhūr) can fully perform such Hajj rites, and if he is only excused (maʿdhūr) from committing some prohibitions (muḥarramāt) of iḥrām, his proxy is valid.
Ruling 107: If a proxy (nā’ib) becomes excused (ma‘dhūr) during the performance of the proxy Hajj in a way that leads to deficiencies in the rites, the hiring contract is not valid. The obligatory precaution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al‑wājib) is that the Hajj should be reperformed for the person on whose behalf the Hajj is performed (manūb ‘anhu), and a mutual settlement (muṣālaḥah) should be reached between the proxy (nā’ib) and the person represented (manūb ‘anhu) regarding the payment (ujra).
Ruling 108: The proxy (niyābah) for those excused from performing the optional staying (wuqūf al-ikhtiyārī) at al-Mash‘ar al-Ḥarām is not valid.[1] If they act as a proxy (nā’ib), they are not entitled to receive payment (ujra). This applies, for example, to caravan staff who are required to accompany individuals with disabilities or to provide certain caravan services that require them to leave Mash‘ar to Minā before dawn (fajr). If such individuals are hired for the proxy Hajj (Hajj al-Niyābī), they must personally perform the optional staying and complete the Hajj rites.
Ruling 109: If the proxy Hajj (Hajj al-Niyābī) of a proxy (nā’ib) who is excused (ma‘dhūr) is not valid, there is no difference whether the proxy is hired for payment or he performs the Hajj gratuitously. Similarly, it makes no difference whether the proxy or the person represented (manūb ‘anhu) has been ignorant of the excuse. It also makes no difference whether the proxy has been ignorant of the fact that that excuse (‘udhr) makes his proxy invalid, or whether the person represented (manūb ‘anhu) has been ignorant of the fact that such excuses disqualify the proxy—for instance, ignorance of the fact that the proxy cannot rely only on the emergency stay (al-wuqūf al-iḍṭirārī) in al-Mash‘ar al-Ḥarām.
Ruling 110: The proxy (nā’ib) is obligated to perform the rites of the Hajj in accordance with the rulings (fatwās) of his own religious authority (marja‘ al-taqlīd).
Ruling 111: If the proxy (nā’ib) passes away after wearing iḥrām and entering the Ḥaram (the precinct of the Grand Mosque, Kaʿba), the obligation is lifted from the person represented (manūb ‘anhu). However, if he passes away after wearing iḥrām and entering the Ḥaram, then the obligatory precaution (al‑iḥtiyāṭ al‑wājib) is that his proxy Hajj does not suffice (lā yujzī). There is no difference whether the proxy is hired for payment or performs the Hajj voluntarily, and whether it is for the Hajjat ul-Islam or another obligatory Hajj.
Ruling 112: If the proxy (nā’ib) passes away after wearing iḥrām and entering the Ḥaram (the precinct of the Grand Mosque, Kaʿba) and he is hired to perform the Hajj for the person represented (manūb ‘anhu), he is entitled to the full payment (ujra), and the person represented is obligated to pay it to his heirs.
Ruling 113: If a proxy (nā’ib) has not yet performed the obligatory Hajj (Ḥajjat ul-Islam) for himself, the recommended precaution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al-mustaḥabb) is that, after completing the Hajj rites, he should, if possible, perform a ‘Umrat al-Mufradah for himself while still in Makkah al-Mukarramah.
Ruling 114: It is permissible for a proxy (nā’ib) to perform additional ṭawāf or ‘Umrat al-Mufradah on behalf of himself or for others after completing the proxy Hajj (Hajj al-Niyābi).
Ruling 115: 115 – Just as the obligatory caution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al-wājib) is that faith—being a Twelver Shī‘a Muslim— is a necessary condition for a valid proxy (niyābah), being a Shī‘a is also an essential condition, as a matter of obligatory caution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al-wājib), for the rites in which a proxy (niyābah) is permissible, such as ṭawāf, stoning the jamarāt, and sacrificing an animal[2].
Ruling 116: It is obligatory (wājib) for the proxy (nā’ib) to perform the Hajj rites, including ṭawāf al-nisā’, with the intention (nīyyah) of proxy (qaṣd al-niyābah) on behalf of the person represented (manūb ‘anhu).
- The Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries) on the Proxy (Niyābah) in Hajj
The Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries) on the Proxy (Niyābah) in Hajj
Ruling 117, Question: A person in al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah hires someone to perform a Ḥajj al-Mīqātī[1] on behalf of his father, but he does not specify whether the hired person should enter iḥrām from al-Shajarah mosque or other mawāqīt. Is it permissible for the hired person to enter iḥrām for an ʿUmrat al-Mufradah from Masjid al-Shajarah, and then later proceed to Juhfah or Qarn al-Manāzil[2] to enter iḥrām there for the hired ʿUmrat al-Tamattuʿ?
Answer: It is permissible for him to enter into iḥrām for ʿUmrat al-Mufradah from Masjid al-Shajarah, and then to enter iḥrām for the hired ʿUmrat al-Tamattuʿ from one of the five designated mawāqīt. However, if the hiring contract in al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah specifies that iḥrām must start from Masjid al-Shajarah, then the hired person should adhere to that.
Ruling 118, Question: Q: A person has registered for Hajj and made a will (waṣiyyah) specifying that his son should use his Hajj voucher (in Farsi, fīsh-e ḥajj) and perform Hajj on his behalf. After the father’s death, the son has become financially capable (mustaṭi‘), but it is only possible for him to go for Hajj using his Hajj voucher. Upon reaching the mīqāt, is it permissible for the son to perform Hajj on behalf of his father or for himself?
Answer: If the cost of the Ḥajj al-Mīqātī does not exceed one-third (thulth) of the father’s estate—or if the heirs permit the amount exceeding one-third—then the son is obligated to perform Hajj as a proxy for his father.
Ruling 119, Question: In the previous ruling, if the deceased has not made a will, and the heirs give the voucher to one of the financially capable (mustaṭi‘) sons to perform Hajj on behalf of their father. Upon reaching the mīqāt, should he perform Hajj on behalf of his father, or is he obligated to perform Hajj for himself due to his financial capability (istiṭāʿah)?
Answer: Even in this scenario, where the father’s voucher makes the performance of Hajj possible, the Hajj by proxy (niābah) for the father takes precedence.
Ruling 120, Question: In the two previous scenarios, if the son is obligated to perform Hajj by proxy (niābah) on behalf of his father, but performs Hajj on his own behalf, is his performance of Hajj for himself sufficient for his own Ḥajjat ul-Islam?
Answer: Its sufficiency for Ḥajj ul-Islam is a matter of objection (maḥall al-ishkāl)
Ruling 121, Question: A person whose father has been financially capable (mustaṭī‘) and passed away sets out to perform Hajj using the father’s Hajj voucher (permit) with the intention (nīyyah) of performing Hajj on his behalf, but upon reaching one of the mawāqīt, he becomes financially capable (mustaṭī‘) himself. What is he obligated to do? (It is notable that his father has left no will (waṣiyyah), nor has another heir asked him to perform Hajj on behalf of the father; in other words, he is the only heir of his father, and there has been no other way except for him to perform Hajj.
Answer: He is obligated to perform Hajj on his own behalf and hire a proxy (nāʾib) to perform Hajj on behalf of his father.
Ruling 122, Question: If a person is hired as a proxy (nā’ib) to perform certain rites of Hajj, such as performing the ṭawāf, stoning the jamarāt, or sacrificing an animal, is it obligatory for him to be in a state of iḥrām?
Answer: It is not obligatory for him to be in a state of iḥrām.
Ruling 123, Question: If a proxy (nā’ib), at the time of iḥrām at the mīqāt, makes an intention (nīyyah) to perform Hajj on behalf of a specific person, but during the rites—intentionally or forgetfully—changes his intention to someone else, what is he obligated to perform?
Answer: This does not suffice, and it is obligatory for the proxy (nā’ib) to perform the proxy rites exactly as he has made intention (nīyyah) at the time of iḥrām.
Ruling 124, Question: If a person is hired to perform the rites of ‘Umrah or Hajj (or ṭawāf specifically), is it permissible for him to recite the Qur’an on behalf of another person, whether as a paid service or as a free act?
Answer: There is no objection to this.
Ruling 125, Question: If a proxy (nā’ib) intentionally neglects to perform the stoning of the Devil (ramy the Jamarāt), what is the ruling on his proxy (niyābah) performance?
Answer: Ramy the Jamarāt is one of the rites of Hajj. If the proxy (nā’ib) does not perform correctly, the validity of his proxy (niyābah) is a matter of objection, especially if he does not compensate for it during Ayyām al-Tashrīq (the Days of Tashrīq).
Ruling 126, Question: If the excuse (‘udhr) of the person on whose behalf the Hajj (manūb ‘anhu) is removed before the proxy (nā’ib) completes the rites, does the Hajj performed by the proxy suffice?
Answer: The Hajj performed by the proxy (nā’ib) is not sufficient.
Ruling 127, Question: If the hiring contract is general (not specifying whether it’s for discharging an obligation (tafrīgh al-dhimmah) or merely for performing specific rites), and the proxy (nā’ib) dies after wearing iḥrām and entering the Ḥaram (the precinct of the Grand Mosque, Kaʿba), is he entitled to the full payment (ujra) or to a prorated payment (i.e., only to a payment based on the rites he has performed)?
Answer: If the hiring is for performing and discharging the obligation (tafrīgh al-dhimmah) of the person on whose behalf the Hajj is performed (manūb ʿanh), which is generally the case in a proxy Hajj contract, then the proxy (nā’ib) is entitled to the full payment.
Ruling 128, Question: A proxy (nāʾib) can perform a proxy rite during part of his proxy service, but he fails to do so despite having sufficient opportunities. For example, although he can perform the stoning of the Jamarāt before noon on the 12th Dhul-Hijjah, he delays without excuse, and later, due to overcrowding, illness, or other reasons, is unable to perform it anymore. Similarly, for example, he postpones the rites of Makkah al-Mukarramah (such as ṭawāf) without any excuse for several days, and ultimately cannot perform them due to illness. What is the ruling on the validity of his proxy (niyābah)?
Answer: If the hiring contract (ijārah) is for the same year, the obligatory caution (al‑iḥtiyāṭ al‑wājib) is that the contract is invalid (bāṭil). The greater caution (aḥwaṭ) is that he may hire a proxy (nā’ib) for the missed rite, and reach a settlement (muṣālaḥah) of the payment (ujra) with the hirer (mustaʾjir). However, if the hiring contract is not for a specific year, the obligatory caution (al‑iḥtiyāṭ al‑wājib) is that the proxy Hajj must be performed in the following year.
Ruling 129, Question: A proxy (nā’ib) knows he has been hired to perform the Hajj al-Tamattu‘, but he is not sure whether he has been hired to perform the Ḥajjat ul-Islām (obligatory Hajj), a vowed Hajj, or a recommended (mustaḥabb) Hajj. Is it sufficient and valid if he makes the intention (nīyyah) of “performing the Hajj al-Tamattu‘ for the person represented (manūb ʿanh)” or “performing the Hajj for which he has been hired”?
Answer: A brief (general) intention (nīyyah) to perform the Hajj for which he has been hired as a proxy is sufficient.
Ruling 130, Question: If a person obligated to accompany a woman or someone with physical limitations to Mina at midnight on Eid al-Adha (the Feast of Sacrifice on the 10th of Dhul-Hijjah) knows that he can return to Mash‘ar al-Ḥarām in time to perform the optional stay (wuqūf al-ikhtiyārī), is it permissible for him to perform the proxy Hajj (Hajj al-Niyābi)?
Answer: His proxy (niyābah) remains valid as long as performs the Bayn al-Tulū‘ayn (the time between dawn and sunrise) staying (wuqūf).
-
- CHAPTER FOUR The Rites of the ‘Umrah al-Tamattu‘
- CHAPTER FIVE The Rituals of the Hajj al-Tamattu‘
- CHAPTER SIX The ‘Umrah al-Mufradah
- Miscellaneous Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries)
Miscellaneous Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries)
Ruling 602, Question: Recently, under an agreement between the Hajj and Pilgrimage Organization and Bank Melli Iran, applicants for the Hajj al-Tamattu‘ deposit one million tomans into a personal account at the bank under a written muḍārabah contract (a profit-sharing contract whereby one party provides the capital for another to trade with for an agreed share of the profit). The funds remain in the depositor’s account until the time of the pilgrimage, and annual profits are paid to him according to the contract. When the turn for pilgrimage arrives (usually after three years), the depositor withdraws the funds and pays the Hajj fees. Since the contract is written and there is no verbal exchange between the depositor and the bank, what is the ruling on the percentage of profit that the depositor receives from the muḍārabah contract?
Answer: The banking transaction conducted via a written muḍārabah contract in the described manner is valid, and the profit earned is permissible (ḥalāl) for the depositor. The principal amount, if derived from income Khums (one-fifth religious tax) has not been paid, is liable for Khums. The profit, if not accessible before the year of pilgrimage, is considered income for the year in which it is received. If the profit is spent on Hajj expenses within the same year, it is exempt from Khums.
Ruling 603, Question: The stone flooring of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque) is sometimes ritually purified with qalīl (or “little amount of”) water, poured directly onto impure (najis) areas in a way that may not fully remove the impurity (najāsah). Is prostration (sujūd) on such flooring valid?
Answer: Since the impurity (najāsah) of all areas of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque) is not usually established with certainty, and investigation is not obligatory, prostration (sujūd) on its stone flooring is valid.
Ruling 604, Question: When al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque) becomes impure (najis) due to blood, urine, or other impurities (najāsat), workers may use a purification method that, in our view, may not affect the purification (taṭhīr). What is the ruling on prayers performed on the ground of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque)—whether moist or dry?
Answer: As long as you do not have certainty (yaqīn) regarding the impurity (najāsah) of the place of prostration (sujūd), the prayer is valid.
Ruling 605, Question: Is it valid and sufficient to perform congregational prayer in a circular formation around the Holy Ka‘bah, assuming all other conditions are met?
Answer: The prayer of those standing behind the imam, or to either side of him, is valid. However, the recommended precaution (al-iḥtīyāṭ al-mustaḥab) is that those standing at the imam’s side should observe the distance between the imam and the Holy Ka‘bah and should not be closer to the Ka‘bah than the imam. As for those standing on the opposite side of the Ka‘bah, facing the imam, their prayer is not valid.
Ruling 606, Question: Is it valid to follow a Sunni imam for a missed prayer (Ṣalāt al-Qaḍā’)?
Answer: It is not valid to follow a Sunni imam for a missed (Ṣalāt al-Qaḍā’) prayer.
Ruling 607, Question: What is the ruling on leaving al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque) or Masjid an-Nabawi (the Prophet’s Mosque) during the adhān and iqāmah (two formulas for calling to prayer), especially when Sunnis enter at that time and criticize us for leaving?
Answer: If others regard such an action as belittling the prayer at its earliest time, especially if it results in discrediting Shi‘ism, it is not permissible.
Ruling 608, Question: If a Hajj pilgrim has the intention (nīyyah) of staying in Makkah al-Mukarramah for ten days, what is the ruling on the prayers in ‘Arafāt, Mash‘ar al-Ḥarām, Minā, and the areas in between?
Answer: If the intention (nīyyah) to stay in Makkah al-Mukarramah for ten days is made before traveling to ‘Arafāt, then after completing the ten-day stay, the ruling of residence (staying) remains in effect. The journey to ‘Arafāt, Mash‘ar al-Ḥarām, Minā is not regarded as a new journey, so prayers should be performed in full (tamām).
Ruling 609, Question: Does the ruling of takhyīr (the free choice between full (tamām) and shortened (qaṣr) prayer) apply to the entire cities of Makkah al-Mukarramah and al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah, or is it limited to al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque) and Masjid an-Nabawi (the Prophet’s Mosque)? Is there a difference between old and new neighborhoods?
Answer: The ruling of takhyīr applies throughout both Holy cities, and there is no difference between old and new neighborhoods. However, the recommended precaution (al-iḥtīyāṭ al-mustaḥab) is that a Hajj pilgrim should perform shortened (qaṣr) prayers outside the two Holy Mosques unless he makes the intention for a ten-day stay.
Ruling 610, Question: Is it permissible for a traveler to perform the supererogatory prayers (nawāfil) of Ẓuhr and ‘Aṣr prayers in places where takhyīr (the free choice between full (tamām) and shortened (qaṣr) prayer) applies?
Answer: If he chooses to perform full (tamām) prayers in places of takhyīr, it is permissible for him also to perform the daily supererogatory prayers (nawāfil).
Ruling 611, Question: What is the ruling on the Hajj performed by a pilgrim who refrains from participating in the ritual of the “Disavowal of the Polytheists” (Barā’ah min al-Mushrikīn)?
Answer: His Hajj is valid. However, such a pilgrim deprives himself of the merits of participating in the ritual of the declaration of the disavowal of Allah’s enemies.
Ruling 612, Question: Is it permissible for a woman in a state of menstruation (ḥayḍ) or puerperium (nifās) to sit on the wall shared between the portico (or pillared hall) of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque) and the Mas‘ā (the area between Marwah and Ṣafā)?
Answer: There is no objection to sitting there unless it is established that the wall is part of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque).
Ruling 613, Question: What is the defined age of menopause (being yā’isah) for women who are Sayyidah and for those who are not?
Answer: The precise determination of the menopause age is a matter of deliberation and precaution. Women may refer to another fully qualified authority (mujtahid) for a ruling in this matter.
Ruling 614, Question: What is the ruling on a pilgrim’s Hajj if he doubts the timing of the wuqūfs (staying) and the day of ʽĪd al-Aḍḥā due to differing opinions on moon sighting? Is he obligated to perform his Hajj again?
Answer: If the pilgrim acts according to the ruling of a Sunni muftī who confirms the sighting of the crescent of Dhū al-Ḥijjah, that suffices. Thus, if he performs the wuqūfs along with the other pilgrims, his Hajj is valid.
Ruling 615, Question: Is it permissible to recite Qur’an, supplications, or perform recommended (mustaḥabb) prayers behind Maqām Ibrāhīm (Abraham’s Station) in a way that restricts space for those performing the obligatory (wājib) ṭawāf prayer?
Answer: It is preferable—and indeed the recommended precaution (al-iḥtīyāṭ al-mustaḥab)—that he should not perform such acts of worship behind Maqām Ibrāhīm (Abraham’s Station) during busy times when others are performing the obligatory (wājib) ṭawāf prayer.
Ruling 616, Question: Is prostration (sujūd) valid on a carpet in Masjid an-Nabawi (the Prophet’s Mosque), considering that using permissible items for prostration—such as paper or a straw mat—draws attention, subjects the worshipper to hostile looks, and gives opponents an excuse to mock?
Answer: In situations where taqiyyah (precautionary dissimulation) is necessary, prostration (sujūd) on a carpet or similar surface is valid, and it is not obligatory to move elsewhere for prayer. However, if a pilgrim can prostrate on straw mats, stones, or similar valid surfaces without severe difficulty (mashaqqah), the obligatory precaution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al-wājib) is that he should do so.
Ruling 617, Question: Is it permissible to prostrate on the stone flooring of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque) and Masjid an-Nabawi (the Prophet’s Mosque)? In general, on what types of stones is prostration (sujūd) permissible? What is the ruling on prostrating on bricks and pottery?
Answer: It is permissible to prostrate on marble and stones used in construction or decoration, as well as on bricks, pottery, plaster, lime, and cement. Although prostrating on agate (‘aqīq), turquoise (fīrūzah), and pearl (durr), and similar stones, is also valid, the recommended precaution (al-iḥtīyāṭ al-mustaḥab) is that such items should not be used for prostration.
Ruling 618, Question: What is the ruling on performing wuḍū’ (minor ritual ablution) with water that has been allocated only for drinking?
Answer: If the permissibility (ibāḥah) of using the water is doubtful, then wuḍū’ performed with it is invalid.
Ruling 619, Question: If the most knowledgeable marja‘ al-taqlīd (great Muslim religious authority for following) has not issued a ruling but only an obligatory precaution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al-wājib), and a less knowledgeable marja‘ al-taqlīd has issued a clear ruling without an obligatory precaution, is it necessary for the follower of the most knowledgeable marja‘ to be aware of the obligatory precaution and intend to refer to the less knowledgeable marja‘? Or is it sufficient that he, in performing his religious duty, follows the ruling of the latter?
Answer: If, at the time of acting, the action was performed based on the ruling of the marja‘ whom he was religiously permitted to follow, and he intends to follow that marja‘ in that ruling, then his action is valid.
Ruling 620, Question: Hajj pilgrims or other travelers sometimes find the time for prayers while on an airplane. Considering that prayer on an airplane usually does not prevent stability (istiqrār) or composure (ṭuma’nīnah), if the other conditions—such as standing, facing the qiblah, bowing, and prostration—can be observed, is it permissible for them to pray on the plane even if they know or suspect they will arrive before the prayer time ends and they can pray on the ground? If they pray on the plane and arrive before the time ends, are they obligated to repeat the prayer?
Answer: If stability and facing the qiblah are possible, the prayers performed on the airplane are valid and sufficient. In fact, praying at the beginning of its time (awwal al-waqt) is even more preferable to attaining its merit.
Ruling 621, Question: A Hajj pilgrim has completed the recommended ‘Umrah al-Tamattu‘, but he is unable to perform the Hajj al-Tamattuʿ, for example, due to being assigned to serve pilgrims during Ayyām al-Tashrīq (the Days of Tashrīq) in Makkah al-Mukarramah. What is his obligation?
Answer: He may abandon the recommended ‘Umrah al-Tamattu‘. However, the recommended precaution (al-iḥtīyāṭ al-mustaḥab) is that he should perform Ṭawāf al-Nisā’.
Ruling 622, Question: If a person becomes insane after the obligation of Hajj has been established, what is the duty of his guardian with regard to the Hajj?
Answer: The guardian of a person who is insane has no obligation to perform his Hajj. If he later regains sanity, he is obligated to perform the Hajj himself. Otherwise, after his death, a proxy (nā’ib) should be appointed from their estate to perform the Hajj on his behalf.
Ruling 623, Question: In Iran, we have received funds to donate to the Prophet’s Holy Shrine or the graves in Baqī‘. Since fulfilling this request is not possible, may we give it to needy Shi‘a instead?
Answer: If the owners of the funds consent, it is permissible to distribute them to needy Shi‘a.
Ruling 624, Question: Many Hajj pilgrims are eager to perform i‘tikāf (Islamic spiritual retreat) at al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque). Since fasting is a condition for i‘tikāf, is it permissible for them to make a vow (nadhr) to fast and perform i‘tikāf while they are in Makkah al-Mukarramah?
Answer: The obligatory precaution (al-iḥtiyāṭ al-wājib) is that the vow should be made in a pilgrim’s homeland or place of residence.
Ruling 625, Question: If a Hajj pilgrim intends to perform i‘tikāf (Islamic spiritual retreat; religious seclusion) in al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque)—considering that the area of sa‘y (walking or jogging fast between the hills of Safā and Marwah) is not part of al-Masjid al-Ḥarām—is it permissible for him to enter iḥrām from Masjid al-Tan‘īm before the call to morning prayers and complete the remaining rituals while in i‘tikāf?
Answer: It is permissible for him to enter iḥrām, and there is no objection to leaving al-Masjid al-Ḥarām (the Holy Mosque) to perform sa‘y.
Ruling 626, Question: Is the recommendation (istiḥbāb) to fast three days in al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah for fulfilling one’s needs exclusive to travelers, or does it also apply to residents of al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah and those who have the intention (nīyyah) to stay there for ten days?
Answer: The recommendation (istihbāb) to fast three days in al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah for fulfilling one’s needs is not exclusive to travelers. The mention of the word travelers [in the related ruling] is due to the general exemption from fasting when they are on a journey.
- Grand Ayatollah Khamenei’s Selected Messages and Statements on the Ritual of Hajj
Grand Ayatollah Khamenei’s Selected Messages and Statements on the Ritual of Hajj
“Pray as much as you can. Supplicate as much as you can. In Masjid al-Haram and in Medina [Masjid al-Nabawi], repeat and increase those deeds that the Almighty God loves, which are sincere action, sincere view, and beseeching God.… the supplications that have been narrated. Or there are the supplications that are not specific to those places [Masjid al-Haram and Masjid al-Nabawi], such as the Kumayl Supplication. It is very good to read the Kumayl Supplication together in a group.”[1]
“For the individual Muslim, Hajj is an opportunity to enter the vast world of spirituality, to get rid of the imperfections of daily life, and to enter a sincere, spiritual atmosphere. It is an opportunity to get closer to Allah and to practice voluntary asceticism. From the very beginning of the Hajj rituals, pilgrims avoid the ordinary things that are permissible in daily life. Iḥrām is to consider as ḥarām the things that are ordinarily permissible in everyday life. Some of these things that have been declared halal prepare the ground for a lack of vigilance, and some others bring about decadence.
During the Hajj rituals, all the means of material and superficial pride are taken away from us. First, we lose our ordinary clothes. All pilgrims relinquish their ordinary clothes and social status and wear the same uniform. During iḥrām, pilgrims are not allowed to look at themselves in a mirror because this is indicative of a tendency towards narcissism. They are also not allowed to use perfume because it is a means of attracting attention. Pilgrims are not allowed to escape from the sun and rain. Also, they are not allowed to take shelter under a roof because all these acts signify a tendency towards laziness and luxury. Pilgrims are advised against pinching their nostrils when they go through a stinky place. These acts, as well as all the other acts related to iḥrām, strip us of all means of material and superficial pride. Iḥrām is to consider as ḥarām the ordinary things that bring about luxury and sensual desires and give rise to arrogance and discrimination. During iḥrām, all these acts are avoided.
Then pilgrims enter Masjid al-Haram and feel its glory with their hands, eyes, and all their being. The glory of Masjid al-Haram is not because of its material attractions. Its glory cannot even be described by ordinary human beings. Afterwards, pilgrims go around the Ka‘aba along with many other people while they are involved in dhikr and duā. Then the pilgrims go through the other rituals of hajj. The same spiritual intensity permeates the sa‘y between Ṣafā and Marwah, the wuqūf at ‘Arafāt and al-Mash‘ar al-Ḥarām, and the ritual of the days of Minā. This is [an image of] Hajj.”[2]
“Those who travel to Mecca should not sacrifice the sanctity of Mecca for mere shopping or wandering through the markets. Mecca is far above such trivial matters. They can certainly make another trip later for business and visit wherever they wish. However, during Hajj, they should reserve these ‘Appointed Days’ (Ayyam al-Maʽlūmāt) for themselves—for pilgrimage, reflection, and remembrance—and not waste them on worthless activities. Participate in congregational prayers and attend gatherings. Make sure to perform the prayers on time and in congregation, especially within the sacred precincts. Let your presence be one of sincere faith and piety, as is expected from the people of Iran.”[3]
“In Hajj, one of the most important issues is coexistence. People who do not know each other at all – people from different cultures, countries, ethnicities and languages – must live together here.”[4]
“As far as the political aspect of the hajj is concerned, the main objective pursued by this pilgrimage is to display the unified identity of the Islamic Ummah. The separation of Muslim brethren from each other paves the way for those with malevolent intentions and helps the seeds of discord grow among Muslims.
The Islamic Ummah comprises various nations and races and followers of different Islamic schools of thought. This diversity, which is accompanied by geographical dispersion in a volatile and important region of the planet Earth, may be regarded as a strong point of this great community which makes its common heritage and culture and history more efficient in a vast expanse of land and puts a multiplicity of human and natural capabilities and potentials at its disposal.”[5]“Hajj is a manoeuvre to show off one’s power in the face of the arrogant people who are the center of corruption, oppression, the destruction of the weak, and plunder. Today, the body and soul of the Islamic Ummah are covered with blood due to their oppression and their malevolence. Hajj is a manifestation of the hard and soft powers of the Islamic Ummah. This runs in the nature of Hajj. It is the soul of Hajj, and it incorporates some of the most important goals of Hajj. This definition is one that our late Imam – the great Khomeini – described as Ibrāhīmī (Abrahamic) Hajj.”[6]
“Abrahamic Hajj, which Islam has presented to Muslims as a gift, is the manifestation of pride, spirituality, unity and glory. It demonstrates to ill-wishers and enemies the greatness of the Islamic Ummah and its reliance on God’s eternal power. It highlights the distance between Muslims and the cesspool of corruption, humiliation and tyranny that international oppressors and bullies impose on human communities. The Islamic and monotheistic hajj is the manifestation of being “firm against the unbelievers, compassionate among themselves[7]”. It is the stronghold of renouncing unbelievers and promoting friendship and unity among believers.”[8]
[1]. In the meeting with Hajj officials (on May 17, 2023)
[2]. In the Meeting with Hajj administrators and officials (on November 5, 2008(.
[3]. In the meeting with Hajj officials (on April 20, 1994).
[4]. In the meeting with Hajj officials (on June 8, 2022).
[5]. Message to the Great Hajj Congress (on December 29, 2006).
[6]. Message on the Occasion of Time of Hajj (on July 28, 2020).
[7]. The Holy Qur’an, 48:29.
[8]. Message to Muslims Worldwide on the Occasion of Time of Hajj (on September 5, 2016).
