The Office of the Supreme Leader
Download:

The Rites of Hajj 2026

  • INTRODUCTION The Merits and Significance of Hajj
  • CHAPTER ONE General Rulings
  • CHAPTER TWO The Obligatory Hajj (the Ḥajjat ul-Islam)
  • CHAPTER THREE The Proxy (Niyābah) in Hajj
    • The Conditions for the Proxy (Nā’ib) in Hajj
    • The Conditions for the Person Represented (Manūb ‘Anhu)
    • The Rulings of the Proxy (Niyābah)
    • The Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries) on the Proxy (Niyābah) in Hajj
      Print  ;  PDF
       
      The Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries) on the Proxy (Niyābah) in Hajj

       

      Ruling 117, Question: A person in al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah hires someone to perform a Ḥajj al-Mīqātī[1] on behalf of his father, but he does not specify whether the hired person should enter iḥrām from al-Shajarah mosque or other mawāqīt. Is it permissible for the hired person to enter iḥrām for an ʿUmrat al-Mufradah from Masjid al-Shajarah, and then later proceed to Juhfah or Qarn al-Manāzil[2] to enter iḥrām there for the hired ʿUmrat al-Tamattuʿ?
      Answer: It is permissible for him to enter into iḥrām for ʿUmrat al-Mufradah from Masjid al-Shajarah, and then to enter iḥrām for the hired ʿUmrat al-Tamattuʿ from one of the five designated mawāqīt. However, if the hiring contract in al-Madīnah al-Munawwarah specifies that iḥrām must start from Masjid al-Shajarah, then the hired person should adhere to that.

       

      Ruling 118, Question: Q: A person has registered for Hajj and made a will (waṣiyyah) specifying that his son should use his Hajj voucher (in Farsi, fīsh-e ḥajj) and perform Hajj on his behalf. After the father’s death, the son has become financially capable (mustaṭi‘), but it is only possible for him to go for Hajj using his Hajj voucher. Upon reaching the mīqāt, is it permissible for the son to perform Hajj on behalf of his father or for himself?
      Answer: If the cost of the Ḥajj al-Mīqātī does not exceed one-third (thulth) of the father’s estate—or if the heirs permit the amount exceeding one-third—then the son is obligated to perform Hajj as a proxy for his father.

       

      Ruling 119, Question: In the previous ruling, if the deceased has not made a will, and the heirs give the voucher to one of the financially capable (mustaṭi‘) sons to perform Hajj on behalf of their father. Upon reaching the mīqāt, should he perform Hajj on behalf of his father, or is he obligated to perform Hajj for himself due to his financial capability (istiṭāʿah)?
      Answer: Even in this scenario, where the father’s voucher makes the performance of Hajj possible, the Hajj by proxy (niābah) for the father takes precedence.

       

      Ruling 120, Question: In the two previous scenarios, if the son is obligated to perform Hajj by proxy (niābah) on behalf of his father, but performs Hajj on his own behalf, is his performance of Hajj for himself sufficient for his own Ḥajjat ul-Islam?
      Answer: Its sufficiency for Ḥajj ul-Islam is a matter of objection (maḥall al-ishkāl)

       

      Ruling 121, Question: A person whose father has been financially capable (mustaṭī‘) and passed away sets out to perform Hajj using the father’s Hajj voucher (permit) with the intention (nīyyah) of performing Hajj on his behalf, but upon reaching one of the mawāqīt, he becomes financially capable (mustaṭī‘) himself. What is he obligated to do? (It is notable that his father has left no will (waṣiyyah), nor has another heir asked him to perform Hajj on behalf of the father; in other words, he is the only heir of his father, and there has been no other way except for him to perform Hajj.
      Answer: He is obligated to perform Hajj on his own behalf and hire a proxy (nāʾib) to perform Hajj on behalf of his father.

       

      Ruling 122, Question: If a person is hired as a proxy (nā’ib) to perform certain rites of Hajj, such as performing the ṭawāf, stoning the jamarāt, or sacrificing an animal, is it obligatory for him to be in a state of iḥrām?
      Answer: It is not obligatory for him to be in a state of iḥrām.

       

      Ruling 123, Question: If a proxy (nā’ib), at the time of iḥrām at the mīqāt, makes an intention (nīyyah) to perform Hajj on behalf of a specific person, but during the rites—intentionally or forgetfully—changes his intention to someone else, what is he obligated to perform?
      Answer: This does not suffice, and it is obligatory for the proxy (nā’ib) to perform the proxy rites exactly as he has made intention (nīyyah) at the time of iḥrām.

       

      Ruling 124, Question: If a person is hired to perform the rites of ‘Umrah or Hajj (or ṭawāf specifically), is it permissible for him to recite the Qur’an on behalf of another person, whether as a paid service or as a free act?
      Answer: There is no objection to this.

       

      Ruling 125, Question: If a proxy (nā’ib) intentionally neglects to perform the stoning of the Devil (ramy the Jamarāt), what is the ruling on his proxy (niyābah) performance?
      Answer: Ramy the Jamarāt is one of the rites of Hajj. If the proxy (nā’ib) does not perform correctly, the validity of his proxy (niyābah) is a matter of objection, especially if he does not compensate for it during Ayyām al-Tashrīq (the Days of Tashrīq).

       

      Ruling 126, Question: If the excuse (‘udhr) of the person on whose behalf the Hajj (manūb ‘anhu) is removed before the proxy (nā’ib) completes the rites, does the Hajj performed by the proxy suffice?
      Answer: The Hajj performed by the proxy (nā’ib) is not sufficient.

       

      Ruling 127, Question: If the hiring contract is general (not specifying whether it’s for discharging an obligation (tafrīgh al-dhimmah) or merely for performing specific rites), and the proxy (nā’ib) dies after wearing iḥrām and entering the Ḥaram (the precinct of the Grand Mosque, Kaʿba), is he entitled to the full payment (ujra) or to a prorated payment (i.e., only to a payment based on the rites he has performed)?
      Answer: If the hiring is for performing and discharging the obligation (tafrīgh al-dhimmah) of the person on whose behalf the Hajj is performed (manūb ʿanh), which is generally the case in a proxy Hajj contract, then the proxy (nā’ib) is entitled to the full payment.

       

      Ruling 128, Question: A proxy (nāʾib) can perform a proxy rite during part of his proxy service, but he fails to do so despite having sufficient opportunities. For example, although he can perform the stoning of the Jamarāt before noon on the 12th Dhul-Hijjah, he delays without excuse, and later, due to overcrowding, illness, or other reasons, is unable to perform it anymore. Similarly, for example, he postpones the rites of Makkah al-Mukarramah (such as ṭawāf) without any excuse for several days, and ultimately cannot perform them due to illness. What is the ruling on the validity of his proxy (niyābah)?
      Answer: If the hiring contract (ijārah) is for the same year, the obligatory caution (al‑iḥtiyāṭ al‑wājib) is that the contract is invalid (bāṭil). The greater caution (aḥwaṭ) is that he may hire a proxy (nā’ib) for the missed rite, and reach a settlement (muṣālaḥah) of the payment (ujra) with the hirer (mustaʾjir). However, if the hiring contract is not for a specific year, the obligatory caution (al‑iḥtiyāṭ al‑wājib) is that the proxy Hajj must be performed in the following year.

       

      Ruling 129, Question: A proxy (nā’ib) knows he has been hired to perform the Hajj al-Tamattu‘, but he is not sure whether he has been hired to perform the Ḥajjat ul-Islām (obligatory Hajj), a vowed Hajj, or a recommended (mustaḥabb) Hajj. Is it sufficient and valid if he makes the intention (nīyyah) of “performing the Hajj al-Tamattu‘ for the person represented (manūb ʿanh)” or “performing the Hajj for which he has been hired”?
      Answer: A brief (general) intention (nīyyah) to perform the Hajj for which he has been hired as a proxy is sufficient.

       

      Ruling 130, Question: If a person obligated to accompany a woman or someone with physical limitations to Mina at midnight on Eid al-Adha (the Feast of Sacrifice on the 10th of Dhul-Hijjah) knows that he can return to Mash‘ar al-Ḥarām in time to perform the optional stay (wuqūf al-ikhtiyārī), is it permissible for him to perform the proxy Hajj (Hajj al-Niyābi)?
      Answer: His proxy (niyābah) remains valid as long as performs the Bayn al-Tulū‘ayn (the time between dawn and sunrise) staying (wuqūf).
       

      [1]. It refers to the specific locations, known as Mawāqīt, where Hajj pilgrims begin their Hajj journey by entering the state of iḥrām
      [2]. Juhfah and Qarn al-Manāzil are two of the five designated Mawāqīt for Hajj and ʿUmrah.

       

  • CHAPTER FOUR The Rites of the ‘Umrah al-Tamattu‘
  • CHAPTER FIVE The Rituals of the Hajj al-Tamattu‘
  • CHAPTER SIX The ‘Umrah al-Mufradah
  • Miscellaneous Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries)
  • Grand Ayatollah Khamenei’s Selected Messages and Statements on the Ritual of Hajj
700 /