The Office of the Supreme Leader
Download:

The Rites of Hajj 2026

  • INTRODUCTION The Merits and Significance of Hajj
  • CHAPTER ONE General Rulings
  • CHAPTER TWO The Obligatory Hajj (the Ḥajjat ul-Islam)
  • CHAPTER THREE The Proxy (Niyābah) in Hajj
  • CHAPTER FOUR The Rites of the ‘Umrah al-Tamattu‘
    • First. Iḥrām
    • Second: Ṭawāf
      • The Conditions of Ṭawāf
      • The Obligations of Ṭawāf
      • The Rulings on Abandoning Ṭawāf and Doubts in Its Performance
      • The Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries) on Ṭawāf
        Print  ;  PDF
         
        The Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries) on Ṭawāf

         

        Ruling 399, Question: What is the criterion for being considered an excessive doubter (kathīr al-shakk) during ṭawāf?
        Answer: Being a kathīr al-shakk (an excessive doubter) is determined by customary criteria.

         

        Ruling 400, Question: If a Hajj pilgrim takes a short rest after a few rounds of ṭawāf and, when he returns to complete it, he doubts whether he has been in the fifth or sixth round, what is his duty?
        Answer: Doubt between the fifth and sixth round invalidates the ṭawāf in all cases.

         

        Ruling 401, Question: A Hajj pilgrim performs the ʿUmrah al-Mufradah on behalf of his father, and then the next day he enters iḥrām on behalf of his mother. In between, he realizes that the ṭawāf and prayer for the first ʿUmrah have been performed without wuḍūʾ. What is his duty?
        Answer: The second iḥrām is valid. However, the ṭawāf and prayer of the first ʿUmrah must be performed again.

         

        Ruling 402, Question: Is it obligatory for a Hajj pilgrim to perform the ṭawāf prayer as close as possible to the Maqām Ibrāhīm (Abraham’s Station), even if it causes pressure or hardship for those doing ṭawāf?
        Answer: In this scenario, proximity to Maqām Ibrāhīm is not obligatory.

         

        Ruling 403, Question: Is it permissible for a woman to take pills or similar medications to delay her menstruation (ḥayḍ) so that she can perform ṭawāf and its prayer on time?
        Answer: It is permissible for her to take pills or similar medications if it does not cause significant harm.

         

        Ruling 404, Question: What is the ruling for a Hajj pilgrim who adds an extra round to his ṭawāf as a precaution? Does it matter whether this intention (nīyyah) is made before starting or during ṭawāf?
        Answer: There is no objection to adding an extra round to his ṭawāf if there is no doubt about the number of rounds and the person has made the intention (nīyyah) from the beginning to perform seven rounds.

         

        Ruling 405, Question: After performing several rounds of ṭawāf, I thought one of the rounds was invalid, so I abandoned that ṭawāf and started a new one. Is the ṭawāf valid?
        Answer: Abandoning one round of ṭawāf is a matter of objection, but it does not invalidate the entire ṭawāf. However, ṭawāf remains valid, and there is no objection if you abandon all previous rounds and restart the ṭawāf from the beginning.

         

        Ruling 406, Question: After performing one round of ṭawāf, because I thought it was invalid, I restarted the ṭawāf. Is my ṭawāf valid?
        Answer: Your ṭawāf is valid.

         

        Ruling 407, Question: If a Hajj pilgrim believes that his first ṭawāf or sa‘y is invalid—such as thinking the ṭawāf or sa‘y is invalid because he has performed congregational prayer or rested between rounds—he repeats the ṭawāf or sa‘y. Is his act considered valid?
        Answer: If, based on this belief, he abandons his first ṭawāf or sa‘y and performs a new one, the new act is valid.

         

        Ruling 408, Question: After abandoning ṭawāf, is it obligatory for a Hajj pilgrim to wait a certain period or perform an invalidating act before starting a new ṭawāf?
        Answer: The intention (nīyyah) to abandon the ṭawāf is sufficient. It is not obligatory to wait a certain period or perform an invalidating act.

         

        Ruling 409, Question: What is the ruling if a Hajj pilgrim takes a few steps unintentionally during ṭawāf?
        Answer: If he takes his steps on his own free will, even if he sometimes moves forward or to one side due to the pressure of the crowd, his ṭawāf is valid. However, if someone else drives him in a way that takes away his will, the ṭawāf is not valid.

         

        Ruling 410, Question: If a Hajj pilgrim performs sa‘y in a wheelchair pushed by someone else, and if the pilgrim is able to push the wheelchair by himself, what is the ruling?
        Answer: The sa‘y is not valid if a Hajj pilgrim performs it while being pushed in a wheelchair by someone else, despite being able to manoeuvre the wheelchair.

         

        Ruling 411, Question: If restrictions are placed on ṭawāf, is ṭawāf still valid if performed from a great distance from the Ka‘ba or with an obstacle blocking the view of the Ka‘ba?
        Answers: There is no objection if, despite the distance or obstruction, it is customarily considered ṭawāf of the Ka‘ba.

         

        Ruling 412, Question: In the course of ṭawāf, after completing half of it, my wuḍūʾ was invalidated, and I exited al-Masjid al-Ḥarām to renew it. The entire process of leaving and returning took approximately 20–25 minutes.
        • Has the muwālāt (maintaining continuity) been broken, and am I obligated to start ṭawāf from the beginning?
        • Does muwālāt differ for elderly or infirm individuals who naturally take longer to renew ritual purity (ṭahārah) than younger, able-bodied persons?
        • Is there a difference when al-Masjid al-Ḥarām is crowded and causes delays compared to when it is less crowded?
        • If I doubt whether muwālāt has been disrupted, what is the ruling?
        Answer: Muwālāt (maintaining continuity) is an objective and customary concept and does not depend on individual circumstances or time variations. Therefore, there is no difference between the elderly and the young, nor between crowded and uncrowded conditions. If a Hajj pilgrim doubts whether muwālāt has been broken, it is presumed that it has not been broken.

         

        Ruling 413, Question: Considering that when a Hajj pilgrim is able to perform ṭawāf on his own, it is not valid for others to perform ṭawāf on his behalf, what is the ruling if he is unable to complete all seven rounds by himself, but he is able to perform part of it? Is it permissible to have others assist and perform all seven rounds for him?
        Answer: He must perform by himself the amount of ṭawāf that he is able to do, and it is permissible to have others assist and perform the remaining rounds for him.

         

      • The Etiquettes and Recommended Acts (Mustaḥabbāt) upon Ṭawāf
    • Third: The Prayer of Ṭawāf (Ṣalāt al-Ṭawāf)
    • Fourth: Sa‘y
    • Fifth: Taqṣīr
    • The Rulings on Actions between the ‘Umrah al-Tamattu‘ and the Hajj al-Tamattu‘
  • CHAPTER FIVE The Rituals of the Hajj al-Tamattu‘
  • CHAPTER SIX The ‘Umrah al-Mufradah
  • Miscellaneous Istiftā’āt (Juristic Inquiries)
  • Grand Ayatollah Khamenei’s Selected Messages and Statements on the Ritual of Hajj
700 /